![]() Under "Transform" we've got "Profiled lens correction". This is a nice way to obtain a certain amount of vignetting and distortion and presumably / perhaps ca correction even if the lensfun profile does not exist.įor various reasons sometimes use Rawtherapee instead (it's way faster in use unless OpenCL is employed in DT and lately I've been having OpenCL-related issues with rocm and my AMD HW) and I've been trying to get to grips with how RT functions in this department. Our brains are just suckers for color and contrast.Darktable under lens corrections has the option to select a lensfun profile (if available) or the raw image's built in lens correction profile. That said, when flipping through a series of images each processed by C1 and Filmulator, your eye almost always prefers the C1 image. Highlights are preserved very well in Filmulator and the results look neutral and pleasing. The results from Filmulator appear softer but the chroma is preserved in the details, and you can sharpen things up later if you really want. When pixel-peeping Filmulator side by side with Capture One you immediately notice how C1 punches up saturation and contrast, and how sharpening causes loss of chroma especially in grass and other fine detail (C1). The results have a film-like and neutral appearance, which is what you really want to start with when you begin applying more creative styles, if that's your fancy. I wasn't aware of Filmulator until the article in DPreview, but I've tried it and it's frankly very good. I think most products begin their life as a crazy idea in some developers twisted mind :-) ![]() Filmulator is currently available for Linux and Windows, although CarVac is searching for help to create a macOS version. If you'd like to download Filmulator and try it for yourself, downloads are available here. You can also see a couple of comparisons in this article. To illustrate what Filmulator can do, multiple comparisons are available on the Filmulator website. If you're interested, you can learn more about performing stand development of film by clicking here.įilmulator is on the right. A primary difference between Filmulator and stand development is that the former works in color, whereas stand development, is for black and white analog photography. This is like the film processing technique, stand development. Part of Filmulator's goal is to enhance the perceived sharpness of an image. The tone curve in Filmulator enhances saturation in bright regions and in regions that are already saturated, the brightness is reduced. Large bright regions in your images become darker and smaller bright regions make surrounding areas darker, enhancing local contrast. This brings about several benefits,' per Filmulator. 'Filmulator accepts Raw files from cameras and simulates the development of film as if exposed to the same light as the camera's sensor. 'Here's an example of Filmulator recovering highlights and lightening the shadows without losing contrast.' Filmulator is on the right. As the software gets updated further, its core goal will remain the same, to simulate the development of film in a Raw processor and deliver a simple user experience. The latest update added numerous performance updates to functionality and performance. The creator also doesn't intend to add features such as layers or masking, as these features are outside of the vision for making a simple Raw editor.Īs of this past weekend, Filmulator is up to version 0.11.0. doesn't yet have tagging though, unlike darktable, but that's soon.' In terms of functionality and usability compared to RawTherapee and darktable, Filmulator prioritizes ease of use and streamlined operation, which means that the software doesn't allow for various image editing tasks, like applying individual color curves or performing healing functions. When compared to other open-source Raw editing applications, like RawTherapee and darktable, CarVac states, ' does more file management than RawTherapee or darktable, since will import from a card into a directory structure. When answering another user, CarVac states that Filmulator works with native Raw files from all major manufacturers as well as basic DNG files. ![]() Like Lightroom and numerous other Raw editors, Filmulator delivers a non-destructive editing process. ![]() When asked what separates Filmulator from Lightroom, CarVac stated that while Filmulator similarly handles import, Filmulator is 'very limited to make editing streamlined and quick' and Filmulator offers only basic asset management for now. The creator, CarVac, recently answered some questions in a Reddit thread. It's not designed to do everything that an app like Lightroom can do but rather offer an open-source alternative based on developing film. Filmulator is a Raw photo editing and library management application designed to offer users a simpler, streamlined experience at the expense of flexibility and functionality. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |